Skip to content

UNPUBLISHED REVIEW · Synthetic data only · Interactions stay in this review session

Help & cases

Monday, 14 September 2026 · Synthetic review snapshot

AI guidance → central support role → responsible department → verified resolution. An answer alone cannot close a case. Security incidents go directly to the security owner.

Assigned case example

SYN-CASE-017 Awaiting verification

Attendance exception requires evidence review

Owner: central support role · Priority: normal · Response target: synthetic 4-hour scenario. Production hours and deputy must be configured.

AI abstained: policy evidence insufficient

Human owner assigned and requested resolution recorded

Resolution evidence pending; case remains open

Your local support drafts

No drafts in this review session.

Synthetic review only · Source master PH-WEB-MP-001 v1.1 · No real records, approvals or integrations

PerfectHR · Synthetic review · No production action

API / MCP

Contract field	Proposed value
State	Disconnected design / no API calls
Contract	PH-LOS-INT-001 · draft
Identifiers	tenant_id · person_id · position_id · event_id
Validation	Membership, role, field, purpose, schema version
Recovery	Idempotency key, retry, dead-letter and reconciliation

No production endpoint, credential, source ownership or scope is inferred from this design.

PerfectHR · Synthetic review · No production action

SYN-MEMO-014 · v1

Faculty induction evidence checklist

Field	Synthetic value
Originating meeting	SYN-MTG-042 · 2026-09-12
Issuer / authority	HR process owner / approval reference required
Audience	Assigned institution only
Effective / expiry	2026-09-15 / 2026-09-30
Record status	Review draft, not officially issued
Integrity	Final content hash after authorized issuance

A memo without a meeting must say “not meeting-derived” and cite an authorized directive.

PerfectHR · Synthetic review · No production action

No direct score editing. Synthetic scores illustrate the interface; the approved PLCAS formula has not been supplied.

Evidence field	Value
Accepted outputs / target
Evidence coverage
Illustrative score
Period / fixture	September 2026 · SYN-v1
Comparable cohort	Not established; no cross-role ranking
Attribution	Individual output separate from team total

Correction: request → independent review → appended correction → recalculation → notification. A separate human decision must retain its own rationale.